Title:
A bad deed
By
Author: Emma Courtice
Tag line: Old Mr. Mathers’ had been sitting on
a fortune in real estate. Until someone
decided to evict him, once and for all! (I don’t understand the
apostrophe after Mathers.)
Police characters: Detective Marie DeLuca
The gist: Old man Mathers was found dead in his bed apparently
smothered by his pillow. He lived on a
ramshackle farm that was surrounded by property that was owned by builders who
were putting in modern housing units.
His property was worth a lot of money if only he would sell out to the
investors…but he refused. The first on-
scene cop, a veteran of the force, had suspicions and called in the DB. There were no signs of forced entry but the
old man never locked his doors as he was way out in the country. Mr. Mathers had taken to living downstairs because
he couldn’t handle the stairs any longer.
The living room had been turned into a bedroom and a small bathroom had
been added.
There were
three people at the scene. (The magic number for WW.) The grandson, who was well dressed and drove a
new car, told police that, yes, he had wanted gramps to sell, but there was no
rush. Grandpa was getting up in years
and eventually he and his sister, the two heirs, would get the property. He added that it just goes up in value over
time anyway, so it wasn’t a problem to wait it out. The granddaughter, who was crying, said she
didn’t care about the money; she only wanted her grandfather to be comfortable
and happy. She had done all the renovations
to the downstairs. The third person was the nearest neighbor lady, who had come
over when she saw the lights and heard the sirens. The neighbor said Mathers was a cantankerous
old coot, stubborn, and kept to himself.
She didn’t see anyone visit him besides the two grandkids in years. She
thought it was sad, him living all alone here, living out his years in a tiny
corner of such a big old house.
Det. DeLuca
had all she needed to point a finger.
Can you figure it out?
Crime scene: The farmhouse.
Clues: IMO there weren’t any.
Suspects: The two grandkids and the neighbor lady.
Red herrings: I didn’t see any.
Solution: The neighbor did it. The solution read “She (the neighbor) claimed
not to have visited the farmhouse or spoken to Mathers in years, but she knew
the old man was confined to the ground floor.”
She did it because her property was up for sale and she was getting a
great price, but the deal stipulated that the Mathers’s property had to be
included in the package. He wouldn’t
sell so she took care of business.
My two cents: First of all, let’s talk about the
first on-scene cop. He had suspicions. No kidding?
Mathers was smothered with a pillow.
Did the VETERAN cop think the old guy did it himself? Good thing there
wasn’t a dog, or he would have pointed a finger at the mutt.
Next, do you
feel cheated? I do. Nowhere in the story did it state that the
neighbor hadn’t visited or spoken to Mr. Mathers in years. She certainly was right on the spot when she
saw there was trouble and the police were there, which would lead one to
believe she knew this neighbor, cared about him, and had been there before.
Lastly, why
would you kill someone in a remote place, then show up when the police
come? Wouldn’t you be trying to
establish some kind of alibi for yourself and not chit-chatting with the cops?
I liked the
title.
17 comments:
I thought this story was nicely told but it did fall short for me in a couple of areas. I couldn't see the relevance of the part about the policewoman's jurisdiction, which seemed a waste of words to me. Either she was allowed to investigate or she wasn't, in which case she wouldn't have been called out in the first place. I didn't have the first idea what was meant by cookie-cutter subdivisions, so had to ask Betsi about that, but it seems like a good description now I know.
The veteran beat cop being suspicious of the scene wasn't a problem for me; a pillow is a commonplace thing to see in a bedroom, so unless it was still over the victim's face (and I'm assuming any murderer worth her salt would know better), then he would have to make a judgement based on other factors. This wasn't one with a bloodied statue lying by the corpse, or a knotted cord around the old man's throat. There was apparently nothing to show that this was anything other than a natural death. The veteran cop, of course, knew better.
My biggest gripe is the solution telling us that 'the neighbor claimed not to have visited the farmhouse or spoken to Mathers in years'. The neighbour says no such thing. Actually, she describes him as stubborn and cantankerous, meaning she made no secret of the fact that she HAD spoken to him. That contradiction annoyed me and I wonder, yet again, whether the author's original story has been affected by the edit.
Wouldn't it be good if a few more of the writers whose work makes it into the mag actually dropped by and gave us their fifty cents now and then. I'd love to know how much of their stuff gets changed before it goes in.
Yes, like me, who screams from the rooftops. And, not that I am one to talk about discrepancies in mystery stories, it did occur to me that if the neighbor knew that no one other than the kids visited him in years, it didn't make sense that she hadn't seen or spoken to the old man for years. She sounds closer than that.
Mary Jo, I saw your comment in my e-mail box, but it didn't get posted on here. Maybe it will catch up with us. Anyway, you said something about the word 'can' and I don't see it? can-can-can.
Your other question was about how long does it take to make detective. That varies from state to state and department to department. Most police forces require at least 3 years on the force to be able to sit for the detective test. Then you have to wait for an opening and that might go to a more experienced officer who also passed the test. But it is possible to be quite young and be a detective. Some folks don't want that job. It's hours of investigative work, paperwork, interviewing witnesses that don't get the case anywhere. You can be called anytime day or night, holiday or not, if a crime happens for the unit that you're in. Det. Pioggia from my area was just putting the burgers on the grill on the 4th of July when he got called to a shooting in the city. His wife told me that...she's my Curves instructor. So...it's not everyone's cut of tea. A lot of detectives burn out and change units. There's a lot of that going on. Det. Cass worked narcotics for years... years... until he couldn't take it anymore. Now he's in auto thefts. I'm meandering...I'll stop.
Interesting meandering, though, Jody. My son is a cop, and I think he took the detective test and said not too many cops passed. Some people think it's easy to become a cop, but it's quite a lengthy, challenging process and becoming a detective is likewise.
Thank goodness it IS such a lengthy and challenging process, given the responsibility these people are taking on. Who'd want someone with only five minutes' training investigating their crime?
That should have read Chris, not anon. I pressed too quick %¬}
I havent read the story but the comment "I liked the title " damns it with faint praise! Dont know why some murders get accepted for publication when they arent all that clever and have big holes in the plot. Ginny
Amen, sister.
I just got a rejection on a crossword puzzle one that I was SURE would be accepted. Darn it. There was nothing wrong with the story (I don't think at least...and I did run it by another writer before I sent it out) but it just didn't grab Ms. Granger.
I didn't read this story, but from the review, it does sound like there are some problem areas. I didn't know the author was allowed to "withhold" information that might explain important facts in the story. For example, if the story didn't hint at the neighbor not having visited or spoken to Mr. Mathers in years, how would we even begin to know that?
I am currently writing a mystery. It's hard to provide all the pertinent facts within the short word count content, and give a subtle clue or two. I wonder why some of these that we feel don't quite fit the bill are selected for publication.
Jody, that crossword puzzle story sounds intriguing. Maybe you can allow us to see it, and you will at least have a mini-audience.
Tamara, I'll post it next week.
Joyce, I think sometimes when Johnene edits, she makes cuts that screw up the flow without realizing it. It's not fair to withhold information so that the reader can't possibly solve the story. That's the whole point of the column.
I think it is a common error editors make -- cutting something without checking to make sure what's left flows smoothly. Or changing a word, when the replacement word is one that has just been used in a previous sentence.
@ Tamara
But isn't that their job? I don't get it. That's the only thing they have to do; pick a great story and tweak it so it's fabulous and fits the magazine's vision...not screw it up. Sometimes I think they're so busy putting their stamp on 'one tree', they lose the forest.
Yes, Jody, as far as I'm concerned, their job is to tweak a story to fit their space and make corrections -- where needed. I know I've groaned about this before, but I believe they make a lot of unnecessary changes, which creates more opportunities for errors. Making changes just for the sake of making them is, in my opinion, not fair to the writer. It must take a lot of time, too, and they all claim to be so busy....
That's what they get paid for. Have to justify that pay check. I'm sorry, but the writer is waaaayyy down on the Totem Pole. Haven't you noticed?
Right, "I'm an editor, so what can I change here" (whether it needs it or not)?
Quote marks should be at the end, speaking of editing:).
Post a Comment